|   |  | 
  
    |  | Valeriy 
	Chervyakov, Igor Kon* |  
    | Sexual Revolution in Russia and 
the Tasks of Sex Education |  
    | AIDS in Europe: new 
		challenges for social sciences. Ed. by Theo Sandford et al. London: 
		Routledge, 2000, pp.119 –134. 
 The so-called sexual revolution of the 1960s in Western Europe and the 
		United States has been thoroughly discussed in the scientific literature 
		(see, for example, Clement, 1990; Haavia-Mannila and Rotkirch, 1997; 
		Reiss, 1990; Schmidt, 1993; Schmidt et al., 1994; Schwartz & Gillmore, 
		1990). Contrary to media representations and popular belief, this 
		‘revolution’ was in fact a multifaceted and contradictory process. Some 
		behavioural and attitudinal changes were substantial whereas others had 
		more of an evolutionary character. Thus, the authors of the US National 
		Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS) have recently stated that ‘social 
		forces – demographic, economic, technological, and social organisational 
		– produced the long-term social trends that have culminated in what some 
		have perceived to be the “revolutionary” transformation of sexuality 
		among young people, while the so-called sexual revolution of the 1960s 
		may have been more of a social construct than a label for concomitant 
		changes in sexual practice.’ They conclude that ‘these changes may be 
		more appropriately termed evolutionary in character.’ (Laumann et al., 
		1994, p. 542).
 
 The term ‘sexual revolution’ refers to various changes, including those 
		in moral standards, sexual attitudes and practices, number of partners 
		and gender differences. Age at first intercourse is generally considered 
		one of the most significant indicators of changes in sexual behaviour. 
		In all Western countries, young people are reported as having become 
		increasingly sexually active over the past 35 years. In particular, the 
		1960s sexual revolution in the West was characterised by rapid changes 
		in age of sexual debut. Both the tempo and the pattern of these changes 
		does, however, vary between countries (Rademakers, 1997). That is why we 
		focus in this chapter on this indicator.
 
 There exist few reliable data on the sexual behaviour of Russians (for a 
		general overview see Kon, 1995, Kon, 1997a, Kon, 1999). The data that 
		are available, however, show more or less the same general trends as 
		have occurred in the Western countries. According to the Golod surveys 
		in Leningrad, in 1965 only 5.3 per cent of sexually experienced 
		university students reported having had first intercourse before the age 
		of 16. In 1972, 8 per cent of the sexually initiated reported having 
		begun their sexual life before the age of 16, and in 1995 this figure 
		had risen to 12 per cent (Golod, 1996, p. 59). Results of our own 1997 
		survey among students’ parents about the age of their own sexual debut 
		provide evidence to suggest that the observed tendency was valid for 
		other parts of Russia, too. The median age of the first sexual 
		intercourse for the cohort of the females born in 1942-51 was 21. In the 
		cohort born between 1952-61 it was 20, while in the cohort born between 
		1962-6 it was 18. Comparison with twelve European countries for which 
		there is comparable data shows that in cohorts born between 1942-51 and 
		between 1952-61, only Portuguese women reported starting their sexual 
		life later than Russian women, while all the others did so earlier. For 
		those, who were born in 1962-66 the situation has changed. In addition 
		to Portuguese women (whose median sexual debut age was 19.8) women in 
		Greece (median sexual debut age 19.2), Belgium (18.6), Switzerland 
		(18.5) and France (18.2) reported starting later than Russian women (See 
		Bozon & Kontula, 1998, pp. 42-44).
 
 These findings suggest that changes over the last three decades in the 
		sexual behaviour of Russian people show similar trends to those observed 
		in the West. In Russia, however, these changes have had a less definite 
		character and because of political and ideological restrictions have 
		taken place largely ‘under cover’.
 
 As might be expected, Gorbachev’s perestroika which brought about a 
		general liberalisation of social life, made these changes in sexual 
		attitudes and behaviour both visible and dramatic. As a consequence of 
		increasing freedom of speech and of the press, mountains of erotica and 
		pornography earlier unavailable to the general public appeared on 
		bookstands. Ideological and administrative control lost its strength. 
		Western patterns of behaviour became role models. Modern contraceptives 
		started to be used, while the danger of AIDS, which had long been a 
		reality in the West, remained distant for many Russians.
 
 The aims of this chapter are to discuss the dramatic changes in the age 
		of sexual debut which took place in Russia in the mid-nineties, to 
		analyse the consequences of these changes, and to examine current 
		Russian views on sexuality education.
 
 Methods
 This chapter is based on the results of three social surveys of young 
		people’s sexual behaviour and attitudes, conducted by the authors. The 
		first of these took place in 1993 among 1615 secondary school and 
		vocational school students aged 12 to 17 in Moscow and St. Petersburg. 
		It was the first ever survey to examine the sexual behaviour of school 
		students in Russia and its aim was to obtain an overall picture of 
		sexual attitudes and behaviour. A self-administered questionnaire was 
		used. No detailed information on the circumstances of sexual debut, the 
		type of first partner or other sexual activities was gathered.
 
 The second survey, sponsored by The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur 
		Foundation, was carried out in 1995. A self-administered questionnaire 
		was completed by 2871 respondents aged 16 to 19 in Moscow (large city), 
		Novgorod (medium sized city), Borisoglebsk and Yeletz (both small 
		towns). Unmarried girls and boys, students of secondary and vocational 
		schools, university students and working adolescents were sampled in 
		equal proportions in each of the four sites. Educational institutions 
		were randomly sampled within each site. The questionnaire contained 
		questions about issues such as the context of sexual debut, the first 
		and the last partner, number of partners, etc. For the first time, a few 
		questions touched on the delicate issues of masturbation and homosexual 
		experience (data not analysed here). In this chapter, and for the sake 
		of comparability, only the findings for secondary school and vocational 
		school students are described.
 
 The third survey formed part of the project ‘In-school sex education for 
		Russian teenagers’ initiated by the Ministry of Education and supported 
		by UNFPA and UNESCO. Data was collected from seventh to ninth grade 
		students, their parents and teachers in eight sites throughout Russia 
		(Moscow, Moscow district, St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk, Krasnodar, 
		Krasnoyarsk, Udmurtia and Yaroslavl). The survey was conducted in 16 
		schools that agreed to take part in the project. The aim of the work was 
		to assess the students’ knowledge and understanding of sexuality, their 
		interest in these matters, sources of information about sexuality, and 
		the dynamics of their sexual behaviour. Since it was planned to evaluate 
		the future educational effects of the family and the school on moral 
		values and students’ behavioural patterns, we also assessed parents’ 
		views about sex education and collected data regarding parents’ own 
		sexual debut and their awareness of sexual problems.
 
 Fieldwork was carried out in the first quarter of 1997. Respondents’ 
		participation in the survey was voluntary and self-administered 
		questionnaires were completed in anonymously. In total, about 4000 
		students’ questionnaires, 1300 parents’ questionnaires and 400 teachers’ 
		questionnaires were found suitable for data processing.
 
 CHANGES IN AGE OF SEXUAL DEBUT
 Comparison between the 1993 and 1995 survey data testifies to the fact 
		of a substantial change in the age of sexual debut has taken place. 
		While in 1993 only one of four 16 year-old girls reported having had 
		sexual intercourse at least once, in 1995 a third did so. The proportion 
		of sexually experienced boys of the same age increased from slightly 
		over one third to a half (See Table 1)
 
 
		
			| Gender | Survey year | Age |  
			|  |  | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |  
			| Male | 1993 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 11.4 | 17 | 38.2 | 49.3 | — | — |  
			|  | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 50.5 | 57.1 | 69.8 | 77.5 |  
			| Female | 1993 | 0 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 11.8 | 25.5 | 45.8 | — | — |  
			|  | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 33.3 | 52.4 | 50.8 | 54.8 |  Table 1. Proportion of sexually active respondents by age and gender
 
 Since young people’s sexual behaviour is bly dependent on social milieu, 
		which is reflected in the type of educational institution attended, we 
		also analysed the data separately by school type (See Table 2).
 
 
		
			|  |  | Type of 
				educational institution |  
			| Gender | Year of data 
				collection | Secondary 
				school | Vocational 
				school |  
			|  |  | 16 year-olds | 17 year-olds | 16 year-olds | 17 year-olds |  
			| Male | 1993 | 35.7 | 42.9 | 41.2 | 55.9 |  
			|  | 1995 | 44.1 | 44.1 | 62.7 | 71.9 |  
			| Female | 1993 | 16.4 | 29.0 | 39.3 | 58.5 |  
			|  | 1995 | 23.9 | 40.3 | 46.0 | 60.8 |  Table 2. Proportion of sexually experienced secondary school and 
		vocational school students, by age and gender, 1993 and 1995 survey 
		samples
 
 As the table shows, while social differences are important, similar 
		overall changes took place in both types of institutions. This suggests 
		that changes in age of sexual debut can not be treated as an artefact 
		caused by changes in sample design. We found further evidence of 
		dramatic change in sexual behaviour between 1993 and 1995 when we 
		analysed answers to the question about age at first intercourse 
		independently for different age groups within one and the same sample 
		(survey of 1995). Among 16-year-old women, there were twice as many 
		sexually experienced girls than among the 19-year-old respondents when 
		they were at their 16s (23 per cent vs. 11 per cent). The same 
		difference was found between the 17 year-old women and 19 year-olds who 
		had been sexually experienced at 17 (45 per cent versus 24 per cent 
		respectively) (See Figure 1). The same tendencies were observed among 
		male students, although the changes were not as large.
 
 Comparing the age of sexual debut across different countries is 
		complicated because of sampling differences and the differences in 
		methods of measurement. For example, differences in social and/or ethnic 
		origins of the respondents can not always be assigned accurate 
		weightings, and these factors may have a significant effect on studied 
		variables. Moreover, the median, which is often used to describe the 
		average age of sexual debut, varies depending on the age cohorts 
		included in a sample, and does not allow correct comparison even using 
		additional mathematical procedures such as survival analysis or life 
		table procedures. The available data, however, do give some idea of how 
		Russian teenagers fare in comparison to those in other countries.
 
 In 1988 in the United States, 33 per cent of white never married 
		teenagers reported having had first sexual intercourse by the age of 16, 
		and 53 per cent by the age of 17 (Sonenstein et al., 1991). Among 
		Russian 16-year-old respondents, 39 per cent already were already 
		sexually experienced by this age, while among those who were 17, 29 per 
		cent had had such an experience by the age of 16, according to our 1995 
		survey. In the same survey in the United States, 53 per cent of 
		17-year-olds and 51 per cent of the 18 year-olds had had sexual 
		experience by the age of 17. If we compare our data with those from this 
		American study, we can conclude that age of sexual debut in the two 
		countries is practically the same. But the American survey had been 
		carried out seven years earlier.
 
 While Russian absolute figures are not in themselves sensational and are 
		in many ways comparable with Western survey data (see for example Nguyet 
		et al., 1994, Johnson et al., 1994, etc.), the pace of change in Russia 
		has been very fast. Moreover, sexual awareness and literacy is poor and 
		adolescent sexuality is bly influenced by general criminalisation of 
		social life. Because of this, unprotected and early sexual activity may 
		have serious psychological and epidemiological consequences, especially 
		for women.
 
 CIRCUMSTANCES OF SEXUAL DEBUT
 Our 1995 survey findings shed light on the circumstances in which first 
		sexual intercourse usually occurs. Almost as a rule, girls’ sexual debut 
		happens with a partner who is appreciably (two years or more) older than 
		she is herself. 40 percent of the sexual debuts of 14 year-old girls 
		happen with partners who are 18 years or older. One in five boys of this 
		same age is also initiated by a legally adult female. But if girls 
		fairly often have their first sexual experience with men who are more 
		than five years older than they are (as happened with 22 percent of the 
		female respondents), for boys such an age difference is an exception 
		rather than a rule (less than five percent).
 
 Interestingly, the first sexual partner tends to be someone of the same 
		age when acquaintance before first intercourse exceeded one year. Nearly 
		half (48 percent) of the girls who had their sexual debuts with boys of 
		the same age, did so after knowing him for more than a year. While among 
		teenage girls the majority always comprises those who start their sexual 
		life with partners who are 2 years or more older, among 15 year-old boys 
		the majority (63 percent) have their first sexual experience with girls 
		of the same age, and this proportion increases with age.
 
 The portion of sexual debuts in which the partner is quite literally a 
		stranger, is surprisingly large: eleven percent of sexually active girls 
		reported that they did not know their first partners at all, and nine 
		percent reported that they had been acquainted with their first partner 
		for about a week. Thus, every fifth girl had her sexual debut with 
		someone she either did not know or with whom she had only just became 
		acquainted. Among boys the same thing occurs nearly twice as often: 41 
		percent of the boys reported having had their first sexual intercourse 
		with a woman they either did not know previously at all, or with whom 
		they had very little acquaintance. Nearly half of male sexual debuts 
		with much older partners took place at the first meeting. If the boy’s 
		first sexual partner happened to be three or more years older than he, 
		the sexual debut happened in nearly two thirds of the cases no more than 
		a week after acquaintance.
 
 There is a clear trend for the earlier the girl’s sexual debut, the 
		shorter the period of previous acquaintance with her first partner. 
		Thus, more than a third of the girls who had had first sexual 
		intercourse by age 13 had done so with a stranger. And vice versa, the 
		proportion of the same-aged girls who have had their first sex with a 
		partner whom they knew for more than a year, was three times lower. 39 
		percent of the girls who had their first intercourse at 18 had known 
		their partners for more than a year, while those who had had first 
		intercourse with a casual acquaintance, comprised only slightly more 
		than one percent of this age group. Such a tendency was not found among 
		boys.
 
 Overall sexual debut is rarely a conscious, deliberate action prepared 
		for by a long relationship history and tender feelings. Only 26 percent 
		of the males and 31 percent of the females said that they had foreseen 
		that sex would happen with this particular person. For the rest, the 
		selection of the first partner was more or less chance. Thirty percent 
		of the girls even said they never felt the desire for sexual intimacy 
		with anyone before it happened for the first time. The same, however, 
		can not be said about the boys. Only 47 percent of the girls and 23 
		percent of the boys aged 16-17 said that their first sexual partner was 
		their steady boy- or girlfriend. Approximately one-third of the boys had 
		dated their first partner from time to time before first having sex. And 
		nearly every fifth girl and every third boy said that they had no 
		relationship with their first partner before having sex.
 
 Among the boys who had no acquaintance with their first partner before 
		first intercourse, a third nevertheless felt an attraction towards her 
		or something more (30 percent of this category said that they liked the 
		girl, and 3 percent that they were truly in love). However, 58 percent 
		said that they had no specific feelings about the individual concerned. 
		Among the boys who had a one-week acquaintance with their partner, the 
		proportion of those who experienced feelings of care was twice as large 
		and only one of five had had first intercourse without some feelings of 
		attraction. Yet, in general, only 15 percent of the boys felt ‘true 
		love’ for their partner at the time of their first intercourse.
 
 Emotional attraction seems to be a more significant factor in motivating 
		sexual intimacy for girls. More than a third of them stated they were 
		‘truly in love’ with their first partner. Nearly two times fewer girls 
		than boys experienced first sexual intercourse without any feelings 
		towards their partner.
 
 Similar gender differences exist in many other countries as well. Yet 
		the respondents’ lasting impression of their first sexual intimacy 
		corresponds directly to their feelings toward their partner: the more 
		positively attracted they had felt, the more positively the experience 
		was evaluated (or perhaps remembered) (See Table 3).
 
 
		
			| Feelings 
				before first intercourse | Sex | Impression |  
			|  |  | Unconditionally | Fairly | Hard to | Fairly | Unconditionally |  
			|  |  | Good | Good | say, none | Bad | bad |  
			| No feelings at 
				all | Boys | 28,2 | 37,9 | 25,2 | 6,3 | 2,4 |  
			|  | Girls | 4,6 | 14,9 | 34,5 | 19,5 | 26,4 |  
			| Liked | Boys | 42,0 | 44,4 | 9,1 | 4,2 | 0,2 |  
			|  | Girls | 17,8 | 33,3 | 26,3 | 19 | 3,5 |  
			| Were truly in 
				love | Boys | 47,8 | 41,3 | 5,1 | 5,1 | 0,7 |  
			|  | Girls | 26,2 | 40,5 | 17,7 | 14,8 | 0,8 |  
			| Not sure | Boys | 30,8 | 43,6 | 20,5 | 3,8 | 1,3 |  
			|  | Girls | 12,8 | 17,9 | 28,2 | 30,8 | 10,3 |  
 Table 3. Boys' and girls' impressions of first sexual intercourse, by 
		feelings for the partner
 
 First sexual intercourse is evaluated differently by boys and girls. The 
		girls who had no positive feelings towards their partners almost never 
		reported unconditionally positive impressions of first intercourse, and 
		every fourth girl in this group gave a definitely negative evaluation. 
		In contrast, more than a quarter of the boys who felt nothing for their 
		first partner gave a positive evaluation of their initiation, while a 
		definitely negative impression was reported by only a few male 
		respondents. In other words, sexual intimacy without emotional 
		involvement can cause negative feelings in some girls (this may even 
		happen in reported cases of ‘true love’, but the chances are much 
		smaller), while for boys it may only result in a less positive emotions.
 
 Although sexual initiation is romanticised in the public imagination, in 
		reality it seems to be a much less romantic experience, especially for 
		girls. One in four girls reported that her first sexual intercourse left 
		no impression on her at all, and only half of all female respondents 
		experienced positive emotions during their first sexual act (See Figure 
		2).
 
 
 
 Impressions of first intercourse depend largely on who initiated the 
		sexual contact. Among both boys and girls, positive emotional 
		experiences are most often the result of mutual desire. But the 
		proportion of such debuts is not very large. Only slightly more than 
		half of the boys (56 percent) and less than a half of the girls (46 
		percent) had these kinds of debuts. More often, girls’ sexual debuts are 
		initiated by their partners (49 percent), while they themselves initiate 
		the event very rarely (4.3 percent). However, women (generally those who 
		are already sexual experienced) take the initiative with sexually 
		inexperienced boys three times more often (13.5 percent).
 
 According to our 1995 data, 29 percent of girls’ sexual debuts are 
		accompanied by some form of resistance on the part of the girl. 
		Respondents reported that in response to their partner’s initiative they 
		either ‘first resisted but then agreed’ (22 percent), or ‘were against 
		it and fought back till the end’ (7 percent) during first sex. The 
		latter can be characterised as being raped. As a rule, boys in such 
		cases recognised neither the illegality of their actions nor the damage 
		caused by them. One in four boys in fact expressed some agreement with 
		the questionnaire statement that: ‘One must not blame a guy if he has 
		sex with a girl whom he has dated for a long time, even if it is against 
		her will.’
 
 Such behaviour may be partly the consequence of general male lack of 
		understanding of their own, as well as women’s, sexuality, and of men’s 
		inability to talk about sexual issues. Yet we must also take into 
		account the habit of offering ‘token resistance’ to sex, which is 
		widespread among Russian women, because of the existence of a b double 
		standard (Sprecher et al., 1994).
 
 In the 1995 survey, we compared the age at which girls and boys had 
		their first sexual experience, with the age which they considered it 
		best to start. More than half (55 per cent) of the sexually experienced 
		girls were in favour of beginning sexual activity at a later age than 
		they had done themselves. Among boys, the same opinion was expressed by 
		a smaller, but not insignificant, 41 per cent.
 
 All the boys and girls with coital experience were asked how they felt 
		about their sexual initiation with the passage of time. Nearly one-third 
		of the boys answered that they felt they had made the correct decision. 
		Almost the same number did not consider it a major event in their lives. 
		One in four boys experienced mixed feelings, seeing both good and bad in 
		their choice. One in ten felt regret about their sexual debut but only a 
		very few felt it was a serious mistake.
 
 Girls regarded their ‘first time’ somewhat differently. Only about one 
		in five felt that they had made the correct decision, and the same 
		number felt that they had made a mistake. The most common response was 
		one of mixed feelings, recognising both good and bad sides of the 
		experience. In contrast to boys, far fewer girls regarded the event as 
		being of little importance: only 13 per cent said they considered it an 
		insignificant event in their lives.
 
 Girls’ opinion was bly related to age of sexual initiation. The majority 
		(53 per cent) of those who became sexually active at ages thirteen or 
		younger expressed regret about the event. As a whole, among those girls 
		who became sexually active before age sixteen, responses expressing 
		regret outnumbered more positive evaluations.
 
 CONSEQUENCES OF SEXUAL REVOLUTION
 The changes in age of sexual debut, being part of a world-wide trend, 
		can not be judged in terms of being ‘good’ or ‘bad’. However, the 
		potential consequences of this rapid change – including increases in 
		teenage pregnancy, STIs including HIV, rape, prostitution and 
		psychological problems linked early unwanted sex - may be potentially 
		dangerous for society as a whole.
 
 For a variety of reasons, Russian teenagers tend to be poorly prepared 
		for sexual life. For reasons we will return to later, emotionally many 
		may lack adequate preparation for an active sex life. Others may know 
		little about safer sex or the means by which to protect themselves and 
		partners against STIs. Between 1990 and
 
 1996, for example, the incidence of syphilis increase fifty fold in 
		Russia, and 78 fold among young people. In 1996, 265 new cases of 
		syphilis per 100,000 of population were initially diagnosed. The 
		incidence of HIV has also begun to grow near exponentially (See figure 
		2). UNAIDS has recently estimated there may already be more than 40,000 
		cases of infection in the country.
 
 
 
 All these facts suggest that something must be done to limit the 
		potentially negative consequences of the changes that have taken place. 
		The first step may lie in sexuality education, something which at 
		present does not exist in most Russian schools.
 
 LEVELS OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT SEXUALITY
 According to the 1993 survey findings, only 19 per cent of 16 year-old 
		schoolchildren report having received special classes, lectures or 
		seminars on sex education. In 1995, the comparable figure was about 10 
		per cent, and in 1997 it was 22 per cent. About half of the respondents 
		in each of the samples stated that they had received one or two lectures 
		on problems to do with sexuality (most usually STIs and unwanted 
		pregnancy. Only two to five percent of all respondents reported having 
		participated in more than 10 lectures or seminars. In the 1997 survey, 
		respondents were asked the question: ‘In your opinion, do you have 
		enough or not enough knowledge about sex?’ In the seventh grade, 21 per 
		cent of boys and 12 per cent of girls said they knew enough about sex. 
		In the eighth grade, 31 per cent of boys and 17 per cent of girls said 
		so. And in the ninth grade, 34 per cent of male and 27 per cent of 
		female respondents considered that they knew enough about sex. At the 
		same time, only 12 per cent of the teachers consider themselves well 
		prepared to answer students’ and parents’ questions about sexuality. 
		Only one in three parents gave a clear positive response to the question 
		about whether they thought they have enough knowledge about sex.
 
 The most significant increase in factual knowledge – showing a four-fold 
		increase between seventh and ninth grades – concerns topics directly 
		related to the possible means of sexual gratification (such as the 
		questions about the most sensitive sexual parts of a woman’s body, or 
		where the clitoris is located). Forty per cent of the ninth-grade 
		females answered the first question correctly (compared with 9 per cent 
		of the seventh-grade females), and 40 per cent of ninth-grade females 
		(compared with 5 per cent of seventh-grade) demonstrated sound knowledge 
		of the clitoris’ location. However, knowledge about bodily functions and 
		the possible negative consequences of early sexual contact remains 
		grossly inadequate.
 
 SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT SEXUALITY
 According to 1997 survey data, todays young people have much more 
		information about sexuality at their disposal, than did their parents. 
		For members of their parents’ generation, the main sources of 
		information about sexuality were conversations with their peers. Today, 
		however, printed materials and electronic media are more important 
		sources of information. However, this often means only the replacement 
		of one source of misinformation with another more ‘virtual’ one.
 
 For young people, the main sources of knowledge about sexuality are 
		newspapers, books and magazines. Girls (perhaps because they develop 
		earlier) report starting to read these materials earlier than boys 
		(Table 4).
 
 
		
			|  | Grade |  
			| Sources | 7 | 8 | 9 | Total |  
			| Of information | Gender |  
			|  | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F |  
			| Books, magazines, newspapers | 52.5 | 54.1 | 57.4 | 63.6 | 66.5 | 62.3 | 60.7 | 60.8 |  
			| Conversations with friends | 38.8 | 36.6 | 54.9 | 55.8 | 47.5 | 56.3 | 47.7 | 51.6 |  
			| Films, TV programmes | 39.9 | 38.7 | 54.5 | 50.4 | 56.1 | 45.5 | 52.0 | 45.4 |  
			| Parents and other relatives | 8.2 | 32.0 | 10.2 | 25.6 | 12.4 | 24.3 | 10.8 | 26.4 |  
			| Teachers, lecturers | 8.2 | 7.2 | 3.3 | 7.4 | 9.1 | 16.5 | 7.2 | 11.6 |  
			| Sisters, brothers | 6.6 | 13.4 | 9.8 | 11.6 | 8.9 | 6.3 | 8.6 | 9.5 |  
			| Special consultation | 4.4 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 6.1 | 18.8 | 4.6 | 11.3 |  
			| Medical workers | 1.6 | 9.3 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 3.6 | 11.0 | 2.7 | 9.4 |  
			| Girl/boyfriend | 3.3 | 2.6 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 7.5 | 5.1 | 5.6 |  
			| Own 
				experience | 7.1 | 1.5 | 6.6 | 4.7 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 5.5 |  
			| Other | 0.5 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 1.9 |  Table 4. Main sources of knowledge about sexuality, by gender and 
		grade, 1997 survey (per cent)
 
 While conversations with friends are not seen as a particular 
		significant source of information among seventh-grade pupils, by ninth 
		grade girls in particular pay more attention to them than to television 
		programmes. For ninth-grade boys, such information from friends is not 
		so significant as that received through television. Given that 
		television deals mostly in erotic imagery of one kind or another - there 
		are no educational programmes about sexuality on Russian TV- it is clear 
		that boys prefer eroticism to factual knowledge about sexuality.
 
 Our analysis of informational sources shows that by speaking to them 
		more about sexuality, the older generation sometimes looks after the 
		needs of girls. Boys, however, receive much less attention. This is true 
		for all institutional forms of information – such as that provided by 
		teachers and medical workers - as well as for parents.
 
 THE PROBLEM OF ‘SEXUAL PEDAGOGY’
 Generally, Russian public opinion is in favour of sexuality education. 
		In all national public opinion polls conducted since 1989, the vast 
		majority of adults – between 60 and 90 per cent depending upon age and 
		social background - bly support the idea of there being systematic sex 
		education in schools. Only 3 to 20 percent are against it (Kon, 1999). 
		But who should do this work and what exactly should be taught?
 
 Teachers think that parents should provide sexuality education for their 
		children. According to our 1997 survey, 78 per cent of teachers agreed 
		with this. However, this same survey showed how hard it would be the 
		family to take on this role. Only about one out of five teenagers 
		considered it acceptable to discuss problems of sexuality with his or 
		her parents. Parents themselves only reluctantly initiate such topics of 
		conversation with their children. More than half of them reported never 
		initiated such talks with their children; another a quarter had taken 
		the initiative only once or twice; and only one in five mothers (fathers 
		even more rarely) had initiated such conversations with their children 
		on several occasions. According to arents, the primary restraining 
		factors were psychological and educational unreadiness. This is why more 
		than three-quarters of them were in favour of there being special books 
		explaining what can be said to children about sexuality, and how it can 
		be done best. Approximately two-thirds of parents think it would be 
		useful to have seminars devoted to sex education for parents in the 
		schools their children attend.
 
 At present, schools are not ready to carry out sex education. 
		Three-quarters of teachers were convinced that form teachers (those who 
		are primarily responsible for social and moral education) should discuss 
		issues of gender and sexual relations with their students. However, 65 
		per cent of teachers report having never done this, and another 15 per 
		cent had done it only once or twice. It is clear why this is the case: 
		only 11.5 per cent of teachers said they were well prepared for such a 
		task. Eighty five per cent were in favour of special courses on the 
		fundamentals of sexology as part of teacher training.
 
 ATTITUDES TOWARDS SEX EDUCATION
 In general, respondents in the 1997 survey were unanimous that sexuality 
		education courses in schools must be launched. Given other findings, it 
		might be expected that such courses will become one of the favourite 
		curriculum subjects for students. Sixty one per cent of seventh-grade 
		students and 73 percent of students in the ninth grades stated that they 
		would eagerly attend such classes. Only 5 per cent of students would 
		prefer to avoid such lessons if they had the chance. To some extent, 
		this distribution of students’ responses offers an answer to teachers’ 
		worries about the form such education should take – be it a compulsory 
		or voluntary course - when introduced in schools. There are much more 
		serious disagreements among the interested groups, however, with respect 
		to the content of sexuality education. Teachers would like to offer a 
		detailed treatment of anatomy, physiology and ethics, whereas students 
		have more interest in practical issues (Table 5).
 
 
		
			|  | Grade |  |  
			|  | 7 | 8 | 9 | Total |  
			|  | Gender |  
			|  | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F |  
			| Psychology of 
				gender relationships | 54.6 | 60.8 | 59.8 | 69.8 | 62.2 | 67.0 | 59.8 | 66.4 |  
			| Conception, 
				prenatal development and childbirth | 49.7 | 64.9 | 45.5 | 52.7 | 39.6 | 54.3 | 43.6 | 56.2 |  
			| Diversity in 
				sexual orientation, homosexuality, etc. | 27.9 | 26.8 | 27.0 | 24.4 | 18.8 | 24.3 | 23.3 | 24.9 |  
			| Sexual 
				techniques: how to receive more pleasure from sex | 44.3 | 32.5 | 55.7 | 41.5 | 59.9 | 43.5 | 55.2 | 40.4 |  
			| Sexual anatomy 
				and physiology | 45.4 | 42.8 | 43.0 | 46.5 | 44.4 | 45.8 | 44.2 | 45.3 |  
			| Marriage and 
				family life | 63.4 | 79.4 | 58.2 | 70.2 | 56.6 | 66.5 | 58.6 | 70.5 |  
			| Sexual hygiene 
				(sex organs) | 58.5 | 59.8 | 53.7 | 52.3 | 55.6 | 50.0 | 55.7 | 52.9 |  
			| Methods of birth 
				control | 47.5 | 63.4 | 51.6 | 67.4 | 62.2 | 69.3 | 55.8 | 67.4 |  
			| Sexual abuse and 
				avoidance of sexual harrassment | 50.3 | 72.2 | 47.5 | 74.8 | 51.0 | 76.8 | 49.8 | 75.1 |  
			| Prevention of 
				sexually transmitted diseases and AIDS | 72.1 | 82.5 | 76.6 | 83.3 | 78.7 | 84.0 | 76.6 | 83.5 |  
			| Improvement of 
				sexual health | 55.7 | 49.0 | 56.6 | 52.7 | 62.4 | 52.8 | 59.2 | 51.9 |  Table 5. Students’ topic preferences in a course of sex education 
		(those, who called a topic ‘very necessary’, per cent), 1997 survey
 
 Of all the topics proposed in a sexuality education course for both boys 
		and girls, the greatest preference was for information on STIs and HIV 
		prevention. While other aspects of sexuality are covered in the mass 
		media and in printed materials, these specific medical issues are much 
		less frequently addressed.
 
 Problems of sexual harassment, including rape and unwanted sex, are 
		second most significant for girls. With age (and consequently with 
		growing interest toward them from the opposite sex) this emphasis 
		increases. Boys do not show as much interest in these issues. They worry 
		much more about how to improve their sexual potency and performance.
 
 More seventh-grade pupils than older students are interested in the 
		problems of marriage and family life. Girls are more interested in 
		family issues than boys, but even among them this interest decreases 
		with age, being perhaps replaced with more ‘relevant’ problems of gender 
		relationships. The psychology of gender relationships attracts more 
		interest among girls than boys, and this interest grows with age. As 
		they grow older, boys start to pay more attention to feelings, love and 
		interpersonal communication as well.
 
 Girls, much more so than boys, are interested in conception, the 
		development of the human foetus and childbirth. This interest decreases 
		with age equally among boys and girls. Boys have a much higher interest 
		than girls in sexual techniques that enable them to receive more 
		pleasure from sex, and this interest increases with age. Girls also 
		become more interested with age in the ‘technical’ aspects of sex, 
		though these never become a priority. Apparently such concerns are seen 
		as less relevant in school, an interest in them grows later after the 
		ninth grade, and this lack of knowledge can be easily compensated for 
		using books and other sources of material.
 
 In general, as mentioned earlier, young people give priority to such 
		topics as prevention of STIs and AIDS, methods of birth control, 
		problems of family life and the psychology of cross-gender 
		relationships. Topics such as anatomy and physiology, conception, foetus 
		development and childbirth, and sexual hygiene are regarded as less 
		important along with information about differences in sexual orientation 
		and sexual minorities (perhaps respondents are shy to discuss these 
		matters).
 
 CONCLUSIONS
 Our data suggest that school students need sex education and are very 
		interested in questions of sexuality. This interest has primarily a 
		pragmatic motivation. Young people’s curiosity about sexuality in the 
		absence of an elementary knowledge of human anatomy, physiology and 
		hygiene (to say nothing about psychological differences in the sexual 
		response cycles of boys and girls) makes initial experimentation in 
		sexual relationships potentially dangerous.
 
 At the moment, the pedagogical impact of sex education (so far as there 
		is any) seems limited. In fact, schools hope that sex education will be 
		provided by the family, whereas parents rely upon schools to do this. 
		Meanwhile, the main source of information about sexuality is the printed 
		and electronic media, as well as peers. As a result, young people know 
		little concrete about sexually transmitted diseases, have only an 
		overall idea about contraception, and yet their views and attitudes 
		towards sexual behaviour become more permissive year by year.
 
 At present, neither schoolteachers nor parents feel that they have 
		enough knowledge about sexuality. Both parents and teachers want there 
		to be preparation for teaching about sex and relationships in both 
		initial and inservice teacher education, as well as at school for 
		parents. At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that Russia at 
		present lacks appropriate textbooks and methodological materials.
 
 The absolute majority of respondents spoke in favour of introducing sex 
		education into school curricula. Its content, according to the views of 
		students, their parents and teachers, must deal with a wide spectrum of 
		topics, including anatomy and physiology, the psychology of sexual 
		relationships, practical issues of avoiding sexually transmitted 
		diseases and unwanted pregnancy, and the moral aspects of cross-gender 
		relationships.
 
 Our 1997 survey was completed as a part of sociological monitoring for a 
		planned three-year experimental project on in-school sexuality education 
		sponsored by the Russian Ministry of Education and the United Nations 
		Population Fund (UNFPA) in collaboration with UNESCO. However, before 
		the work was even begun, the project came under heavy attack in the mass 
		media for being a ‘Western ideological subversion of Russian children’ 
		(see Chervyakov and Kon, 1998). In some small towns people were asked by 
		journalists on the street: ‘Do you want children to be taught in school 
		how to have sex? If not, please, sign the petition to ban this devilish 
		project.’ Priests and activists alike not infrequently tell their 
		audiences that all bad things in Western life are rooted in sex 
		education, that Western governments are trying now to ban or eliminate 
		it, and that a corrupt Russian government instgated by the world 
		‘sexological-industrial complex’, US secret services and Western 
		pharmaceutical companies, is acting against the national interests of 
		the country. The Russian Planned Parenthood Association is denounced by 
		the Russian Orthodox Church as being a ‘satanic institution’ propagating 
		abortion and depopulation. This anti-sexual and anti-Western campaign is 
		bly supported by the Communists’ dominated State Duma and by the vast 
		majority of Russian newspapers. It has continued for nearly three years. 
		As a result, most attempts to promote sexuality education for young 
		people in Russia had been stopped, and even those groups that worked on 
		such issues before are finding it increasingly difficult to carry on.
 
 REFERENCES
 Bozon, M. and Osmo, K. (1998). ‘Sexual Initiation and Gender in Europe: 
		A Cross-cultural Analysis of Trends in the Twentieth Century’, In 
		Hubert, M., Bajos, N., Sandfort T. (Eds). Sexual Behaviour and HIV/AIDS 
		in Europe. Comparisons of National Suveys. London: UCL Press.
 
 Chervyakov V. and Kon I. (1998). Sex Education and HIV Prevention in the 
		Context of Russian Politics. In Rosenbrock R. (Ed.) Politics behind AIDS 
		Policies. Case Studies from India, Russia and South Africa. SWZ, Berlin.
 
 Clement, U. (1990). Surveys of Heterosexual Behaviour, Annual Review of 
		Sex Research, 1, pp. 45-74;
 
 Golod, S. I. (1996). XX Vek i Tendencii Seksualnikh Otnosheniy v Rossii. 
		SPb.
 
 Hayes, C.D. (Ed.) (1987). Risking the Future: Adolescent sexuality, 
		pregnancy and childbearing (Vol.1). Washington, DC: National Academy 
		Press.
 
 Haavio-Mannila, E., Rotkirch, A. (1990). Generational and Gender 
		Differences in Sexual Life in St. Petersburg and Urban Finland, Yearbook 
		of Population Research in Finland, 34, pp. 133-160
 
 Johnson, A.M., Wadsworth, J., Wellings, K., Field, J. with Bradshaw S. 
		(1994). Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. London: Blackwell Scientific 
		Publication.
 
 Kon, I.S. (1995). The Sexual Revolution in Russia From the Age of the 
		Czars to Today. NY: Free Press.
 
 Kon, I.S. (1997). Seksualnaya Kultura v Rossii. Moscow: OGI.
 
 Kon I.S. (1999). Sexuality and Politics in Russia, 1700-2000. Eder, F.H., 
		Hall l. and Hekma G, eds. Sexual Cultures in Europe. National Histories. 
		Manchester University Press
 
 Laumann, E.O., Gagnon, J.H., Michael, R.T., and Michaels S. (1994). The 
		Social Organization of Sexuality. Sexual Practices in the United States. 
		Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
 
 Nguyet, M.N.T., Mheux, B., Beland, F. and Pica, L.A. (1994). ‘Sexual 
		Behavior and Condom Use: A Study of Suburban Male Adolescents’, 
		Adolescence, 29, 113.
 
 Rademakers, J. (1997). Adolescent sexual development: a cross-cultural 
		perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference on 
		Sexuality Beyond Boundaries, Amsterdam, 29 July - 4 August 1997.
 
 Reiss, I.L. with Reiss, H. (1990). An End to Shame. Shaping Our Next 
		Sexual Revolution. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
 
 Schmidt, G. Hrsg. (1993). Jugendsexualitat. Sozialer Wandel, 
		Gruppenunterschiede, Konflikfelder, Stuttgart: Enke Verlag.
 
 Schmidt, G., Klusmann, D., Zeitzschel, U., and Lange, C. (1994). Changes 
		in Adolescents’ Sexuality Between 1970 and 1990 in West-Germany. 
		Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 5, pp.489-513
 
 Schwartz, P., Gillmore, M.R. (1990). ‘Sociological perspectives on human 
		sexuality’, in Holmes, K.K. et al. (Eds.) Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 
		New York: McGraw-Hill.
 
 Sonenstein, F.L., Pleck, J.H. and Ku, L.C. (1991). 'Levels of Sexual 
		Activity Among Adolescent Males in the United States'. Family Planning 
		Perspectives, 23, 4.
 
 Sprecher, S., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., and Levitskaya, 
		A. (1994). Token Resistance to Sexual Intercourse and Consent to 
		Unwanted Sexual Intercourse: College Students' Experiences in Three 
		Countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 31, 2, pp. 125-132.
 English
 www.pseudology.org
 |  |